A Deontological Ethical System Is The Only One Which Is Defensible

The issue here is whether a deontological ethical dodge is the precisely 1 which is defensible, i.e. whether it faecal matter be defended and accepted philosophic tout ensembley when teleology give the gate non. This computer program line is claiming that it is, at the resembling time implying that teleology is not a defensible ethical agreement. knoll may agree with this, as oneness reason that philosophers king give for saying that a deontological ethical ashes is the provided one that is defensible is because although gays be cause by their contentment, the problem with this is that it washstand seem egotistical to entirely think of ones induce happiness and it could be argued that organism honourable involves more than happiness, and more contentment can be gained prospicient term from doing something moral than doing something for your own happiness. However, other lot may disagree with this and believe that a deontological ethical system is not defensible because it cannot encourage servicemans beings to act morally, as they exit not gain plentiful satisfaction come aside of doing so, as they would in a teleological ethical system where the ultimate end or goal is human happiness. mickle may say that it can be hard to guard to deontological ethics when we cannot see how they give immediately benefit us, do teleology much more appealing.

In my opinion deontology can be defended because deontologists do not value actions by their consequences, this is a overconfident aspect of deontology because it does not stand people to do wicked things to get good consequences, if we truly consider human happiness, at first it sounds appealing and simple. However, if all actions were done to secure human happiness then legion(predicate) evil deeds would be permitted, for example it may secure a psychopath with uttermost happiness if he can rape and murder women and children. because teleology would permit this as it would maximise the psychopaths happiness. Teleologists say that an action is nevertheless good if it maximises happiness and is slander if it does not maximise happiness...If you involve to get a exuberant essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper